This case was studied by an American Professor of Medical Anthropology in the US who has given his conclusion [Evidence document page 1092]. This is reproduced below:
From Professor of Medical Anthropology.
- Greetings from Minnesota.
- I have given considerable thought to your extensive case. I must say that I am most impressed by your accounting of fact and argument. You have made a strong case in law and equally a strong moral argument on behalf of your late wife and all those who have been subjected to the vicissitudes of moral and legal transgressions.
- It would seem to me, albeit speaking from afar, that the Supreme Court should find the case(s) in question compelling. Legal opinion must surely come down on the side of justice and the merit of the case.
- Your perseverance and resolve to correct injustice and to bring both legal and moral clarity to a level of transparency is to be commended.
- Keep this complex profile of socio legal transgression in full public view. The number of lives you will help is enormous.
- Given the wealth of evidence you have accumulated I will be shocked should you not prevail. Your work calls for reform and governmental change in policies and procedures. In the long term it is in the interest of governmental agency to correct the injustices you have pro forma presented.
- To do otherwise is an abdication of both legal and moral responsibility. Not in anyone’s best interest!
- Keep up the struggle you wife would be proud of you. In her name you fight the good fight and no matter what the earthly outcome you will have won. Compassion always triumphs over the heartless predilections of the self-serving and corrupt.
- All the best
Professor of Medical Anthropology.